Monday, January 31, 2022

SAXONS AT KONIGGRATZ: BLOODY BIG BATTLES MEETS KRIEGSPIEL II


Playtest game of 1/2 scale Bloody Big Battles (BBB) using Kriegspiel blocks on a half-scale Koniggratz Kriegspiel map.

In this post, dear readers, we follow up on a previously reported work in progress on putting together BBB at the half scale using Kriegspiel Blocks.  That project has now been realized and I've run the first playtest, which will be the subject of this game report.  I won't go too far in this post on what I've already conveyed in my previous post or on other aspects of putting together maps and materials--I have more in depth information and resources posted on my newly added Bloody Big Battles Resource Page of this blog (there is material there for standard play BBB as well).  But now, on to the battle report.  As usual, in this post you may clix pix for BIG PIX...

I began by referring to the excellent set of scenarios in the European Bloody Big Battles supplement. Given my previous interest in and resources for the 1866 Prusso-Austrian War, and having the Kriegspiel Maps, Koniggratz in digitial form in particular, I decided to work with the Koniggratz scenario.  

I picked the conflict in the southern sector between the Saxons (and adjacent Austrian elements) and the Prussian Army of the Elbe as suitable for a nicely sized test game. The OOB is above (you can also download a pdf of the scenario (with OOB and map).) 

Above, a part of the the southern portion of the huge Koniggratz Kriespiel map with the Saxons laid out for test purposes.  These sheets are printed out at about half size (roughly 1:15,000 as opposed to the original 1:7,500). I put together the nine mapsheets (outlined in red) for the game.  For more on scales, how blocks are configured, etc, I would refer you to the previous post and to the "Guide" on the BBB Resources page.  
The nine sheets trimmed and put together and then put under plexiglass. At roughly 3' x 2' this represents a 4' x 6' playing area and provided more than enough space for a good game (it also fit nicely into a poster frame, which was a happy accident, as reported in my previous post).   
I then used water based paint pens to bring out some terrain features for the game. The Bistritz River had a major impact on action in this sector, so I made sure that it stood out (blue).  BBB differentiates between "Towns" and "Villages" and between regular slopes and  "Steep" slopes. To define them, I outlined BBB "Towns" in black (any other urban feature not outlined would be a "Village" in game terms), and I marked off sections of steep slopes with brown lines.
 
One thing we changed in practice was the formation for units occupying "Towns." Rather than trying to stick to either Line or Depth formation (per BBB), we decided that units in towns were in no "formation"--we simply put the component bases inside the town and conformed them to its shape.  The unit would have 360 degree facing, with the center of the town serving as the FCP (Front Center Point when it came time to calculating movement out of the town); all bases could fire out (in 360 degrees).  However, rather than measuring from the individual bases, fire is measured from the FCP of the unit (ie, center of the town) to the target.  Otherwise, all the rest of the BBB mods and visibility effects applied.  This worked very well as an abstraction for a major formation holding a built up area.  The shape and orientation of towns lent them unique qualities--long linear towns, for instance, and which way their faces were oriented, made them very different animals than more symmetrical or equilateral towns.

Overview of the scenario.  The "main" battle is raging just off the map to the north. The Saxons are deployed in depth in the South, with the Prussian Army of the Elbe coming up with orders to attack across the Bistritz. For this scenario, I included the southernmost (Wimpfen's) brigade of the X Austrian Corps, which was engaged in the "major" fighting to the North. Behind the Saxons, the Austrian VIII Corps is in reserve (in history, this unit had been mauled in previous engagements, which I assume is why it has only one brigade, albeit a big one).  The objectives are in Saxon hands: holding them represents safeguarding the southern flank of the Austrian Army. 
The Prussian Army of the Elbe's entry edge. It can start 1 division on the map within 6" of the marked entry area/edge. The rest enters on turn 1 from the entry edge. You might have noticed the labels for each division (plus battery) unit: I took this idea from Mike C (fellow BBB enthusiast in our group, who I believe got it from somewhere on the web).  These worked out well.
I was very involved with facilitating the game, so there aren't lots of shots of the individual happenings. Instead, I'll illustrate the action graphically. Above: the Saxon maneuvers. In the role of Crown Prince Albrecht of Saxony, Mike C. decided to defend forward, bringing up the Saxon 2nd Division online with the 1st overlooking Bistritz.  Wimpfen's Austrian Brigade was moved down to Tresowitz to challenge any crossing there (and also to range across the front of the Saxon positions). The Saxon rifled artillery maintained its position on the commanding hilltop south of Tresowitz. The Austrian VIII Corps was intended to come up to extend the line, but (characteristically), it was delayed (failing movement rolls and rolling partial moves), only getting to about where the arrow shows by the end of the action. Although Mike C had an extraordinary run of lousy movement dice with these, it seemed right, regardless. This is not uncharacteristic of BBB and does a nice job of reflecting friction.  In this case, I think it prevented (very realistically) a sort of clockwork precision in maneuvering major formations simultaneously over distances to take up positions in relation to one another: simple to do on a wargame table, not so much in practice (as it turned out). 
George, in the guise of Gen von Herwarth commanding the Army of the Elbe, led with the 15th Division on the map with the rest marching on behind.  Initially, the 15th Division, supported by the 16th, went for the town of Sobetus (opposite the Popelwitz crossing) with the idea of forcing a way across there.  However, the combination of the shorter range of the needlegun vs the longer range fire of the Saxons, who could not easily be closed with due to their being upslope and behind the Bistritz, kept them at arm's length. They would wind up shifting around to keep the Saxons fixed in their positions while suffering the long range fire from the Saxons on the ridge and Wimpfen's Austrian brigade in Tresowtiz.  The Saxon battery concentrated its fire on the Prussian guns any time that they came within range, hitting them while still limbered, reducing and silencing the Prussian rifled battery and forcing the Prussian smooth bore battery to reverse march and not come into action. Eventually, the Prussian 14th division worked its way across the Bistritz to the south, sending the small Saxon cavalry division posted there off and then coming into position to threaten the Saxon line.  This is where the tardiness of the  Austrian VIII Corps was very much felt (it being still out of the picture). Meanwhile, the move of Wimpfen's Austrian Brigade down into Tresowitz had opened the door on the Saxon right, through which the Prussian Cavalry brigade trotted. This was to prove decisive...
... the Saxon battery did not get to reorient, leaving the Prussian Cavalry brigade in position to assault it in the flank in the next turn, which it did. Keep in mind that this is 1866, and cavalry is not the force that it would be in an earlier period, which made what follows even more dramatic. Given the unique circumstances, the battery had no defensive fire (which could very well have stopped the cavalry charge), so it went directly to assault resolution. Assaults in BBB are done with a challenge die roll by each side (modified by various elements).  In this case, the Prussians rolled high and the Saxons low, which resulted in the artillery being eliminated and the Prussian cavalry getting an exploitation. This carried it into the rear of the Saxon 1st division.  Given that this was a Saxon full division vs a small cavalry brigade, modifiers in the in this second assault, despite it coming from a flank, were not so lopsided as the previous, but General Dice was riding with General of Cavalry Golitz this day, and the Prussian Cavalry prevailed, inflicting a base loss and forcing the Saxon 1st Divsion to retire!  Given that by now we had proofed the system and that the Austrian VIII Corps was still not even in the picture, we determined to end the game at this point, under the understanding that the Saxons would be obliged to abandon their position to the Army of the Elbe: victory to the Prussians.   

HOW DID IT PLAY?
We found that BBB, as a system, worked perfectly well in this format. We had no trouble executing moves or applying any of the mechanics. Again, I would refer anyone more interested in the details of the half scale variant to the BBB Resource Page for more. 
The biggest shift was not with the game system, but with the perspective of playing on a map  (in a good way).  It was an adjustment for everyone.  Playing on a map caused us to come up with our different way of handling Towns (for instance).  The above situation is a good illustration of what playing on a map brought out. At a glance, the Prussian division above appears to be in a dominating flanking position to the Saxons. However, when we were about to resolve the Prussian fire, we looked more closely and discovered that the terrain said otherwise (the red lines are the sight lines). In the above picture, I have added some dashed lines to bring out the topography under question. There is actually higher ground (two hilltops: a saddle) between the Prussians and the Saxons (although there might be some small part of the Prussian Div on a small hilltop of its own that might have a small window). Furthermore, half of the Prussian division is actually deployed on a downward slope that is looking at the backside of a ridge between it and the Saxons.  Thus, we determined that, collectively, the Prussians would get 2 bases of fire as opposed to the entire division, and we did not give it a flank bonus.  This and other situations like it were very much part of the experience.  Although we were not playing "kriegspiel" (as in hidden movement, etc), I would suggest that there be a non playing facilitator for any game played on a map like this--someone familiar with the terrain and map who can both help players interpret the terrain and make judgement calls like this. I fulfilled that role in our game (and we had no problems). 

Playtesters and amiable companions for the afternoon, Saxon Commander Mike C (left) and Prussian Commander George (red shirt).  As a result of the game and their suggestions, I made some minor adjustments to the player reference and a handling a few of the mechanics. We're now poised to move ahead and try a larger game!

Excelsior!

17 comments:

  1. That looks interesting Ed...not really my cup of tea (I like the toy soldiers too much!) but, like boardgames, I can see the appeal of this slightly unusual form if wargaming

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like me, "slightly unusual"--I'll take it :)

      Delete
  2. Delighted to see this, Ed! Excellent project, and I'm glad that BBB is proving to be a useful tool for it. Looking forward to the next instalment.

    Chris
    https://groups.io/g/bloodybigbattles
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/1412549408869331

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Chris, BBB is starting to take off in our group. My friend Mike C, Saxon in this game, has built up a nice 10mm collection for Franco-Austrian and Risorgimento gaming (so we're not all heretics!).

      Delete
  3. Cool. The game kinda ends up looking like those American civil war trust battlefield maps that I like so much. 😀
    A good way to do large engagements.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Stew: I do think it has a definite aesthetic all it's own, which I like (and not unlike those illustrations that you mention, come to think of it!).

      Delete
  4. Very interesting post, the 2 x 3 format is a really handy format.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes: once you get a good map that you like, you could keep it in a poster frame and pull it out whenever you wanted to have a quick game (I'm thinking that I might get two or three maps like this and just have them ready for use).

      Delete
  5. Very clever stuff and interesting observation about how topography can influence a battle, that you might not get on a flatter miniatures battlefield.
    That said, I still prefer miniatures.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mike: I'm not dumping my miniatures just yet :) It's just another option. The player reference and expanded turn sequence are designed to work with regular BBB, so I would encourage you to still give those a look (on the resource page).

      Delete
  6. A very interesting looking game Ed…
    I do like the whole aesthetic of the setup.

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is an interesting hybrid that brings together campaigns, one off mini battles, and board games. I'm looking forward to taking the next step with it and seeing where it goes--providing the butterfly doesn't flit too soon :)

      Delete
  7. Interesting looking battle, I like the aesthetic, even if my preferred view is a board groaning with 28mm figures and a totally shot ground scale, but it still sounds like fun!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your comment reminds me of the "olden dayes" of miniatures when the central fetish of most "serious" sets of rules was how many feet per inch, how much time per turn, and how many men per figure it represented (and those were only the starting points before the number crunching over rates of fire, ranges, formations, started to get tossed about). Oiy vey!

      Delete
    2. Sounds suspiciously like wargames research group to me!
      Best Iain

      Delete
  8. That is a great way to use blocks! I've seen this done with the BBB maps, but not done in this way and love the whole aesthetic. I'm a fan of blocks and enjoy playing games with them and of course miniatures too. I might give this a go in the future, once I can get my head around all the contours etc!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Steve, I'm going to be running a second playtest game of the full up Koniggratz scenario in about two weeks. Hopefully, I won't get so wrapped up in running it that I'll forget to get some pictures for a game report.

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...